Compare · Image-to-video
Wan-3.0 Image-to-video vs MiniMax H3 Max Image-to-Video
Alibaba Wan 3.0 vs MiniMax H3 Max — 720p target adherence vs silent 480x640 coercion in public benchmarks.
Every value below is read from the model catalog at generation time — price and which parameters each model exposes. 9 of the 11 spec rows differ between these two. “Not exposed” means the model has no API parameter for it — it does not mean the capability is absent. Audio is the clearest case: MiniMax H3 generates sound with the clip but offers no switch to control it, while some models expose one.
Specs
Side by side
| Wan-3.0 Image-to-video | MiniMax H3 Max Image-to-Video | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Qwen | MiniMax |
| List price | $0.060 per second | $0.072 per second |
| Category | Image-to-video | Image-to-video |
| Resolution options | 1080p, 720p, 480p, 720p-esr, 1080p-esr, 1440p-esr, 4k-esr | 480P, 768P, 1440p-sr, 4k-sr |
| Duration options | 2–16s (15 steps) | 5–15s (11 steps) |
| Aspect ratios | not exposed | adaptive |
| Audio parameter exposed | exposed | not exposed |
| Seed / reproducibility | exposed | not exposed |
| Prompt expansion | not exposed | exposed |
| Camera control parameter | not exposed | not exposed |
| Content policy | Qwen standard policy · commercial use | MiniMax standard policy · commercial use |
Wan-3.0 Image-to-video is the cheaper of the two at $0.060 versus $0.072 — a 1.2× difference. At five seconds that is $0.30 against $0.36.
Output
What each one actually produces
These are the real sample clips from the catalog, with the prompt that generated each. Watch both before you decide — a spec table will not tell you whether the motion reads the way you need it to.
Sample · prompt: “The car slowly moved forward in the canyon.”
FAQ
Short answers
Which is cheaper, Wan-3.0 Image-to-video or MiniMax H3 Max Image-to-Video?
Wan-3.0 Image-to-video, at $0.060 per second. The other is listed at $0.072. These are list prices; billing on this site is not live yet.
How does Wan-3.0 Image-to-video fit a product-video workflow?
Wan-3.0 Image-to-video: duration 2–16s (15 steps), resolution 1080p, 720p, 480p, 720p-esr, 1080p-esr, 1440p-esr, 4k-esr. For product clips, start from a clean product photo and describe one camera move.
How does MiniMax H3 Max Image-to-Video fit a product-video workflow?
MiniMax H3 Max Image-to-Video: duration 5–15s (11 steps), resolution 480P, 768P, 1440p-sr, 4k-sr. For product clips, start from a clean product photo and describe one camera move.
What is the maximum clip length for each?
Wan-3.0 Image-to-video: 2–16s (15 steps). MiniMax H3 Max Image-to-Video: 5–15s (11 steps). Longer work means multiple takes stitched together, not one longer request.
Which should I use for image-to-video?
Whichever exposes the parameter you need — the table above is the honest answer. If you are iterating, use the cheaper model until the motion is right, then re-render once. If you need a specific resolution path, check the resolution row: some tiers reach it natively and others via a super-resolution pass, which is not the same thing.